• Blue v. City of Los Angeles
  137 Cal.App.4th 1131 (2006)
  (blight finding required for amendment to extend power of eminent domain; raw data regarding blight not required to be included in administrative record)
  
  
• Bernardi v. City Council of the City of Los Angeles,
  54 Cal.App.4th 426, 63 Cal.Rptr2d 347 (1997)
  (jurisdiction)
  
  
• Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Hawthorne v. Force Electronics,
  55 Cal.App.4th 622, 64 Cal.Rptr2d 209 (1997)
  (deadline for payment of eminent domain judgment)
  
  
• Dusek v. Anaheim Redevelopment Agency,
  173 Cal.App.3d 1029 (1985)
  (CEQA)
  
  
• Redevelopment Agency of Burbank v. Gilmore,
  38 Cal.3d 790 (1985)
  (amicus-eminent domain)
  
  
• Creighton v. Revitsky,
  171 Cal. App. 3d 1225 (1985)
  (elections)
  
  
• Kane v. Hidden Hills,
  179 Cal App.3d 899 (1986)
  (exhaustion of administrative remedies)
  
  
• Community Redevelopment Agency v. Bloodgood,
  182 Cal.App.3d 342 (1986)
  (tax increment allocations)
  
  
• Anaheim Redevelopment Agency v. Dusek,
  193 Cal.App.3d 249 (1987)
  (amicus-eminent domain)
  
  
• Emmington v. Solano County,
  195 Cal.App.3d 491 (1987)
  (redevelopment plan adoption)
  
  
• Arcadia Redevelopment Agency v. Ikemoto,
  10 Cal.App.4th 437 (1991)
  (property tax methods and levies)
  
  
• Redevelopment Agency of Riverside County v. Superior Court,
  228 Cal.App.3d 1487 (1991)
  (exhaustion of administrative remedies)
  
  
• Morgan v. Community Redevelopment Agency,
  231 Cal.App.3d 243 (1991)
  (redevelopment plan adoption)
  
  
• Lippman v. City of Los Angeles,
  234 Cal.App.3d 1630 (1991)
  (Citizen Participation)
  
  
• A.L.A.R.M. v. City of Los Angeles,
  12 Cal.App.4th 1773 (1993)
  (environmental & general plan challenge)
  
  
• Gemtel Corp. v. Community Redevelopment Agency,
  23 Fed.3d 1542 (9th Cir. 1994)
  (inverse condemnation)
  
  
• Lancaster Redevelopment Agency v. Dibley,
  20 Cal.App.4th 656 (1995)
  (low/moderate housing funds)
  
  
• Castaic Lake Water Agency v. City of Santa Clarita,
  41 Cal.App.4th 257 (1995)
  (emergency exemptions from CEQA)
  
  
• City of Livermore v. Pacific Gas & Electric Company,
  51 Cal.App.4th 1410 (1997)
  (amicus-utilities) (stipulated judgment relief)
  
  
• Wagner v. City of South Pasadena,
  78 Cal.App.4th 943, 93 Cal.Rptr.2d 91 (2000)
  (statute of limitations and method of service in challenge to land use actions)
  
  
• Beach-Courchesue v. City of Diamond Bar,
  80 Cal.App.4th 388 (2000)
  (redevelopment plan invalidation)
  
  
• Friends of Mammoth v. Town of Mammoth Lakes,
  Friends of Mammoth (2000)
  82 Cal. App.4th 511
  
  
• Ehrlich v. Culver City,
  12 Cal.4th 858 (1996)
  (taking challenge)

515 S. Figueroa Street
Suite 1850
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Tel. (213) 617-0480
Fax (213) 625-0931

402 West Broadway
4th Floor
San Diego, CA 92101
Tel. (619) 567-3450
Fax (619) 567-3448